When i went to see Avatar at the Imax i found after about an hour into the movie i had to take the glasses off for about a minute as my eyes were tired, I had to do the same thing again after about the same length of time. I found the 3D effect was good but then after a while i never gave the 3d effect much notice, probably that's what Mr Cameron intended or maybe i was thinking that it was too long a movie and my eyes were glazing over. The story could have been written on the back of a postage stamp.
I realised that i don't want all of the films that i go to the cinema to be in 3D from now on - what's the point. I think the effect will be best suited to blockbuster type movies - maybe some types of Disaster/Science Fiction/Horror films
However I wont be buying a 3d tv as i couldn't be bothered with having to wear glasses all of the time. I mean the news in 3d?
At over a hundred quid a pair for the glasses it would cost a medium sized family a small fortune. For me it's all a bit gimmicky. I prefer to watch normal 2D movies that require a great story and are character driven over films that need the wham bam thank you mam effects with the same old boy meets girl, boy saves the world - or America saves the world storylines.
I do appreciate that these movies can be great fun but i think 3D is the movie industry attempting to get more ways for us to buy, rent and go see more movies..... kerching
